Skip to content
Report workflows

Workflow preview

Compare the companies in your sector

Compare the mentions and narratives around a defined group of digital asset companies.

Circle and Coinbase · stablecoin developments
You

How are Circle and Coinbase developing their stablecoin businesses?

Used Perception integration, used a tool
  1. Searching available tools: Perception compare entitiesResult
  2. Perception compare entitiesResult
  3. Done

Circle and Coinbase · stablecoin developments

Circle · 11 May 2026

Agent Stack combines wallets, paid-service discovery, and a CLI for agents transacting in USDC.

Coinbase · Q2 2026 results

Average USDC held in Coinbase products reached $20 billion in its July 30 release.

2 sources[1] Circle · Agent Stack announcement11 May 2026[2] Coinbase · Q2 earnings release30 Jul 2026

Selected company developments with different publication dates. A quantitative peer comparison requires matching periods and definitions.

Claude is AI and can make mistakes. Please double-check responses.

Try this question

Illustrative chat. Saved research · 27 Sep 2026

Ask your own question with Perception connected to your AI.

Preview the dated evidence above. Use the workflow below to generate a brief for your company, audience, and reporting period.

Make this brief your own

Connect your AI

Free MCP includes 5 free weighted credits per day. Replace the bracketed details in the prompt before running it.

Read the reusable prompt
Use Perception to compare [company one], [company two], and [company three] within [sector].

Use the last 30 complete UTC days and state the exact start and end dates. Apply the same source and date filters to every company. Explain how ambiguous company names were resolved.

Compare mention volume, available sentiment measures, and recurring themes. If you calculate share of voice, state the peer set, denominator, and treatment of articles mentioning multiple companies. Omit metrics the available data cannot support.

Provide original source URLs, dates, and supporting excerpts for the material findings. Separate data from interpretation, describe gaps in the source record, and keep the report under 900 words.

Report structure

Scope and method
The peer set, date window, source filters, and entity-matching choices.
Company comparison
Comparable measures with definitions, denominators, and data availability.
Narrative themes
The topics shaping each company’s mentions, supported by source excerpts.
Findings and limits
Interpretation linked to evidence, with gaps and comparability limits stated.